Studio Legale Internazionale Forum Index Studio Legale Internazionale
Discuss Studio Legale Internazionale, our cases and defence law
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in

Back to Studio Legale Internazionale 

Police officer did not make his own witness statement...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Studio Legale Internazionale Forum Index -> Suggest new forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
miketesko



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 1948

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:14 pm    Post subject: Police officer did not make his own witness statement... Reply with quote

Detective sergeant Higham, did not make his own witness statement, dated, 25 August 1985 - instead it was made on his behalf, in his absence, by Detective Constable Richardson...

Richardson made Highams statement for him, in is absence, some seven months after the alleged events had taken place, because Richardson and Higham claimed they made their notes up together in their respective pocketbooks, 44854 and 44787, before they had gone off duty at 12:45am, on 26 January 1987...

An investigation, carried out by Greater Manchester police in 1990, established that Richardson did not have pocketbook, 44787 issued to him until 31 January 1987, and therefore he could not have made his notes up in that book, along with DS Higham, before he had gone off duty at 12:45am, on 26 January 1987...

When Richardson was interviewed by Greater Manchester police in 1990, and it was pointed out to him that his pocketbook, 44787, which contained the relevant information, had not been issued to him, until 31 January 1987, and therefore he could not have made his notes up as alleged, Richardson changed his story, and said that he had actually written up his notes on a piece of foolscap paper, which he later copied into pocketbook, 44787, when it was issued to him on 31 January 1987...

Manchester police then interviewed DS Higham and told him that Richardson was now saying that he made his notes up on a piece of foolscap paper, on 26 January 1987, which he later copied into his pocketbook once it was issued to him on 31 January 1987, but DS Higham continued to maintain that he did not, and that Richardson had written up his notes directly into his pocketbook, 44787, on that occasion...

The evidence relied upon by DS Higham and DC Richardson regarding this matter, was further complicated because of the fact that DS Higham had signed DC Richardsons pocketbook entries, 44787, dated 25 January 1987, and therefore, he would have known that Richardson had not written up those notes in that pocketbook, on 26 January 1987, because that pocketbook, 44787, was not issued to DC Richardson, until 31 January 1987...

Both DS Higham and DC Richardson lied whilst testifying at Mike Tesko's trial, and they were giving conflicting accounts about the same matter, at the time they were being interviewed by Greater Manchester police...

At Mike Tesko's appeal, 1994, Richardson would testify along the lines giving the same explanation he gave to Greater Manchester police in 1990, and DS Higham was not called to testify despite him continuing to maintain that DC Richardson had written his notes up directly into pocketbook, 44787, and that Richardson had not written his notes up on a piece of foolscap paper...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Studio Legale Internazionale Forum Index -> Suggest new forum All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group