Studio Legale Internazionale Forum Index Studio Legale Internazionale
Discuss Studio Legale Internazionale, our cases and defence law
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in

Back to Studio Legale Internazionale 

Why Jeremy Bamber is innocent...by Mike Tesko..

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Studio Legale Internazionale Forum Index -> Jeremy Bamber
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
miketesko



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 1948

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:23 pm    Post subject: Why Jeremy Bamber is innocent...by Mike Tesko.. Reply with quote

Jeremy Bamber did not kill his sister, Sheila "Bambi" Caffell - she did not die until after the police entered the farmhouse, not before they did..

At 7:15am, that morning, WPC Julia Jeapes, a trained firearms instructor, saw a rifle that was leaning up against the main bedroom window from her vantage point in the grounds at whf, ironically, no other police officer had seen this rifle in that position, despite the house being kept under constant observation, from as early as 3:45am..

Two police officers and jeremy, had however, seen a silhouetted figure at the same window at about 3:55am..

The key feature of the sighting of the rifle at the bedroom window, before the armed officers entered the house at 7:30am, that same morning, was that by the time the police got upstairs to the main bedroom and reportedly discovered Sheila's body on the bedroom floor by the side of the bed, she had the gun on top of her body..

According to the police - there was only one gun found inside the main bedroom which contained the bodies of June Bamber, and Sheila Caffell, and that gun they say, was on top of Sheila's body..

How had that gun become moved from its original position at 7:15am, at the bedroom window, to be on top of Sheila's body by 8:30am, that same morning?

At 7:15am, the gun could not have been leaning up against the bedroom window and be on top of Sheila' body on the bedroom floor, it had to be one place or the other, and WPC Julia Jeapes statement, confirms that at 7:15am, the gun was not on Sheila's body, but rather - it was leaning against the bedroom window..

Who moved the gun from the window onto the body in the interim period?

Was it Sheila?

Was it the police?

Who killed Sheila Caffell with that gun?

The police?

Did Sheila take her own life by use of it?

One thing is for certain - and that is that Jeremy Bamber could not have killed her and stage managed her body by planting that rifle on top of her body to try to make it look like she had committed suicide. The gun ended up on Sheila's body after the armed police entered the house, not beforehand..

Jeremy Bamber is completely innocent..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
plankton



Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/NLPs/RWhitakerAffidavit/Schulte.PDF
and
http://www.lucire.com.au/documents/new-drugs-new-problems.aspx


[For avoidance of doubt: Halperidol v HalOperidol. Same drug, more commonly known
as Haldol:
http://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/humanbio/Haldol2.htm
HALPERIDOL
(HALDOL)
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/medicines/100001207.html
Haldol (Haloperidol) ]


2003 re a double homicide:
http://archive.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/memdispo.nsf/04485f8dcbd4e1ea882569520074e698/cbe51f64583d918888256cf300824e83/$FILE/00-35913.pdf

Bone first challenges the state court’s conclusion that he was not prejudiced
by his counsel’s failure to investigate the effects of his Haldol medication, and, in
particular, the finding that the Haldol did not negatively affect Bone, etc.

This I suspect is the answer to the shootings but Jeremy Bamber, like many others in prison, must remain the fall guy in this particular case because NOTHING is allowed to cast doubt on the purported, but scientifically flawed, safety of billion $ annual drug profits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
plankton



Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On a different class of drugs, antidepressants, see how the drug manufacturers fight in the courts for their profits to survive:
http://www.healyprozac.com/

Or here where a 12 year old child is played against profits and the child receives a 'lenient' 30 year sentence:
http://www.justiceseekers.com/default.aspx?menuitemID=202

When children no longer matter to drug manufacturers, adults who happen to be at a place that is convenient to defending millions of dollars of drug income, such as Jeremy Bamber, certainly do not.

They 'eat' children, women, men and all their lawyers for breakfast, they can afford it.
Jeremy is just one of many.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deanasuggate67



Joined: 04 Jun 2009
Posts: 16
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes he is completely innocent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
deanasuggate67



Joined: 04 Jun 2009
Posts: 16
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

we have spoken remember? i just hope one day he will be free
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
deanasuggate67



Joined: 04 Jun 2009
Posts: 16
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

does anyone know what will happen next can jeremy appeal again? and if so when
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Studio Legale Internazionale Forum Index -> Jeremy Bamber All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group