Studio Legale Internazionale

[miketesko]

Essex police, the relatives and the Lab', have all made out a false case, that there was only one silencer involved in this investigation, but there was clearly two different silencers in the possession of the police, and the lab' at different times ...

I believe we are close to establishing exactly what did happen regarding these two different silencers ...

Lets start at the beginning ...

There should have been two different silencers at whf before the shootings took place on 7 August 1985, one belonging to a relative, named, Anthony Pargeter (a prosecution witness) and the other belonging to Ralph Bamber. The former silencer was kept in the downstairs toilet at the scene along with other guns, accessories and ammunition, that were owned by Pargeter. He was licensed by Essex police firearms licensing Dept. to keep and use these weapons on the land belonging to WHF. The latter silencer (Ralph Bambers) was normally kept in the gun cupboard in the downstairs office.

The shootings occurred on the morning, 7 August 1985 ...

The police spent three days examining the scene and on the evening of Friday, 9 August 1985, they handed the keys to whf back to the family.

On that evening, DCI "Taff" Jones, and DS Jones, spoke to Jeremy at his home (9 Head street, Goldhanger) about the silencer. They asked him if on the last occasion he used the rifle whether or not the silencer had been attached to the end of its barrel?

From this, we know that Essex police had got the silencer in their minds, by the end of 9 August 1985..

The family found one of the silencers in the gun cupboard, on Saturday, 10 August 1985, took it home and handed it to the police on 12 August 1985. This was obviously the silencer belonging to Ralph Bambers gun. This silencer was handed over to the police by Peter Eaton, and sent to the Lab' to be examined, by Glynnis Howard, on 13 August 1985 - subsequently handed back to the police the same day, and arrangements were then made to hand this silencer back to the family. This silencer was thus no longer in police possession, from that point, onwards, that is, until 11 September 1985, by which stage Ann Eaton handed it back to the police ...
------------------------------------------------------

On 13 September 1985, this silencer was fingerprinted by DS Eastwood and DS Davidson...
-----------------------------

By this stage, the police had possession of one silencer, whilst the lab' had possession of the other silencer..

--------------------------------

It was not until 26 September 1985, that the Lab' had possession of two different identical looking silencers...

-------------------------------------

Linked to this part of the mystery, is the fact that the police had taken a paint sample from the scene, bearing the identifying mark, RC/1. This was documented as having been taken by the police on 8 August 1985. the reason why the police took it, was because they had found a gun downstairs (somewhere) which had got paint ingrained on the end of its barrel. The gun in question has so far not yet been identified by Essex police, although DS Davidson did confirm its existence during an interview with City of London police in 1992.

It would appear then, that from a very early stage, Essex police were interested in some paint that was found on the end of a guns barrel at the scene - and that the end of the guns barrel they were talking about was not a silencer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the police photographed the body of Sheila with the gun upon it, the end of the guns barrel was exposed, showing that it did not contain its end cap (NUT) and obviously no silencer - the thread on the end of the barrel was clearly exposed and blood free. The police must have set about trying to find out what could or should have been fitted to the end of the guns barrel, at one time or another, and they searched the scene for the two things which could have fitted onto that gun barrel (the NUT and the silencer)...

------------------------------------------------------

The paint sample, RC/1, was taken on 8 August 1985, with a view to making a comparison with paint found to be ingrained on the end of a guns barrel that was found downstairs at the scene - THE NUT could be described as the end of a guns barrel because it fits snugly onto it there.

------------------------------------------

On the following day (9 August 1985) DCI Jones and DS Jones were asking jeremy about the silencer and whether or not it was fitted to the rifle on the previous evening to the shootings? I have no doubt at all in my mind that what the police were doing by this early stage is trying to eliminate for the possibility that the silencer was fitted to the gun, or if the NUT was fitted to the gun,at any stage immediately prior to, and or, during the incident.

-------------------------------------------------------------
I believe that Essex police seized the NUT and a silencer, from the downstairs toilet, at the scene (these were probably given the joint exhibit reference, SBJ/1) ...

--------------------------

The NUt and the silencer were retained by DCI Jones. In particular, the silencer was then used as a paper weight on his desk, in his office at Witham police station, and it remained there for a number of weeks before it was eventually submitted to the lab' to be examined (30 August 1985)...

--------------------------------------------

In between the time of its discovery at the scene (7 August 1985) and its submission to the Lab' on 30 August 1985, this silencer was examined for fingerprints by DI Cook (SOC) by oblique light test, on 15 August 1985, and by superglue treatment, on 23 August 1985...

-----------------------

On or about, 29 August 1985, PC Whiddon, took possession of the silencer from DCI Jones desktop, and took it along to the force amoury, to see if it would fit onto the barrel of the .22 semi-automatic rifle. Once there, he established that it did fit the barrel of the gun. He therefore arranged for it to be examined in more detail by DI Cook (SOC)...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DI Cook (SOC) took possession of the silencer, on 29 August 1985. He dismantled it. He removed the internal baffle plates and laid them out bare on the table top upon which had also been laid out the blood stained rifle, that had been photographed on top of Sheila Caffells bloodstained nightdress. Cook, rebuilt the silencer, and then screwed it directly onto the barrel of the rifle - he took photographs of these experiments. These photographs were not disclosed to Bamber, or his legal team, or to the court which tried him for these murders ..

-------------------------------------

On 30 August 1985, Cook sent the this silencer, to the lab' to be examined by a ballistic expert (Malcolm Fletcher) because he thought the silencer had been damaged after receiving a hard knock during the incident...

----------------------------------------------------

The real reason why Cook thought the silencer had been damaged, was because when he had first dismantled the silencer, on 29 August 1985, he found the baffle plates inserted the wrong way round, inside the silencers tubing - contrary to its design features. With the baffle plates inserted the wrong way round inside the silencer, it made the accessory unstable and dangerous. Any bullets fired through it, would have become damaged due to the unnatural dynamic forces that were prevalent inside it...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the time this silencer was submitted to the Lab' on 30 August 1985, the other silencer was still in the possession of the family...

-------------------------------------------------

The state of play by this stage, was that DCI "Taff" Jones, did not think the silencer had been used in the shootings. If it had been, there could not have been any whole bullets recovered from the bodies of the victims or the scene, because the silencer and the way it had been configured, would have damaged all 25 of the bullets, that might have been fired through it - according to the ballistic expert who examined the 25 crime scene bullets, 12 of them were whole bullets...

------------------------------------------------------

From this it could be concluded that the silencer that Cook had dismantled and rebuilt on 29 August 1985, had not been used in the shootings of the five victims at whf...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would have been impossible for any of the 25 bullets to have remained whole, if any of them had been fired through the silencer, during the incident...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not to be overlooked, was the claim made by the prosecution and its expert witnesses, that the only way Sheila Caffells blood could have got into the silencer, was if it had been fitted to the guns barrel, at the time she was shot and killed ..

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With the silencer attached to the guns barrel, the prosecution alleged that the overall length of the weapon would have been much too long to allow Sheila an opportunity to shoot herself by use of the rifle and silencer, even if she had wanted too...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Somebody must have removed the silencer from the guns barrel, after Sheila was shot and killed...

------------------------------

Somebody took the silencer downstairs and hid it inside the gun cupboard from where the relatives later found it, on 10 August 1985 ...

------------------------------------------------------------

Lets get the facts right ...

None of the 25 crime scene bullets could have been fired through the silencer and remained in a whole condition, because of the way the silencer was configured at the time DI Cook (SOC) dismantled it on 29 August 1985 (baffle plates inserted the wrong way round causing bullets to become damaged upon being fired through it)...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It was inside this silencer, that the crucial flake of dried blood which produced the blood group activity (A, EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1) had supposedly been found which proved that the silencer was fitted to the guns barrel at the time sheila Caffell, was shot and killed? According to the ballistic expert, the two bullets recovered from Sheila Caffells body had been whole bullets - if true, then neither could have been fired through that silencer. How then had Sheila's blood managed to get inside it ...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Between, 12 September 1985, and 20 September 1985, experts at the Lab' examined the flake, and produced a variety of blood group results (A, EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1) which they attributed as being unique and exclusive to Sheila, it had got into the silencer at the time she was shot and killed, with the silencer fitted to the end of the guns barrel ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

That interpretation cannot be right ...

------------------------------------------

If it was Sheila Caffells blood, it did not get into the silencer at the time she was shot and killed, and the silencer at the Lab' by 30 August 1985, had not been fitted to the guns barrel at the time the 25 crime scene bullets had been fired, otherwise, all 25 crime scene bullets would have been damaged...

-------------------------------------------------------

Essex police knew this to be true...

------------------------------------------

The ballistic expert at the lab' knew this to be true...

--------------------------------------------------------------

This was why the other silencer, the one that Ann Eaton had handed back to the police on 11 September 1985, was submitted to the lab' on 26 September 1985 (some six days after the blood group results had already been obtained from the flake from the other silencer). The silencer submitted to the Lab' on 26 September 1985, was therefore, substituted to be the one inside which the crucial flake had been discovered...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These are the circumstances surrounding the silencer and how the blood found inside it, came to be relied upon, to support the prosecution of Jeremy Bamber, for these murders...

-----------------------

Lab' documents were doctored and tampered with, exhibit references for the two different silencers were altered to make out a false case, that there had only ever been just the one silencer, when in fact there had been two different ones..

-------------------------------------------

Silencer exhibit references were altered, or changed from SBJ/1, to DB/1, and to DRB/1, respectively, along with the corresponding Lab' item numbers, 22, 23 and back to 22, again ...

--------------------

By the time these matters came to trial, the silencer was court exhibit number 9, exhibit reference, DRB/1 and Lab' item number 22..

-----------------------------------------------------

The problem with all of this, was that the crucial flake of dried blood which the experts had attributed as belonging exclusively to Sheila, could not have been found inside the silencer to which it had been assigned, because that silencer, had not yet been submitted to the Lab' by the stage at which, the flake was supposedly found inside it - it would have been impossible to find a flake of dried blood, inside a silencer at the Lab' on or before 12 September 1985, if the silencer to which it was attributed to, was not submitted to the lab' until 26 September 1985 (furthermore, the silencer which was at the lab' at the material time the flake was examined, on 30 August 1985, onwards, could not have fired any of the 25 crime scene bullets fired during the event because of the existence of 12 whole bullets amongst them - that silencer was wrongly configured with its baffle plates inserted the wrong way round which served to have a dramatic effect upon the dynamic forces which operated inside the silencer at the time a bullet was fired through it)...

------------------------------------

These are the true circumstances surrounding the use of two different silencers in this case, and how the evidence has been manipulated to support jeremy Bambers prosecution for these five murders..

-------------------------------------------

If there was only one silencer, how could the family have handed over the silencer twice, on two different dates, by different members of the family, to different police officers?

--------------------------

The silencer / blood based evidence derived from it is bogus ..

[deanasuggate67]

hi mike i must just say im so impressed in all the hard work you do for jeremy and he is lucky to have a mate like you, but then again he has been so unlucky in lots of other ways i felt i wanted to write him a letter but i expect he gets that many mine would not make any difference regards deana x

[miketesko]

Hi Deana,

You can always write directly to Jeremy at the following address:-

Jeremy Bamber
A53552AC
C/o B Wing
HMP Full Sutton
Moor Lane
Stamford Bridge
York
YO4 1PS

Please pass on my regards when you write to him, I feel sure that he will write back to you, because he is that sort of a person...

Anyone else is also free to write to Jeremy at the above address...

Best Wishes


Mike.