Studio Legale Internazionale

[miketesko]

Jeremy contacted me yesterday evening by telephone from his prison and informed me that he has made his final submmission to the CCRC in a bid to get them to refer his case back to the court of appeal. Jeremy says that the gist of his appliocation surounds new photoghraphic material not previously released by Essex police and the CPS, and the contents of police radio and message logs. He also mentioned that he has got a new report from one of the worlds leading ballistic and (blood) backspatter experts, Professor Herbert Leon MacDonald, which goes some way to supporting Bambers contention that the police were responsible for stage managing the crime scene, before and during the taking of crime scene photographs, inside the farmhouse.

Jeremy has invited me up to see him in the coming weeks so we can have a chat about his latest attempt to win his relaease and to get his convictions quashed, .
I will update as and when things develop...

(update) ...

Bamber and his legal team were led to believe that all the photiographs connected with the case were held in an album by Essex police, that was known as THE MASTER COPY ALBUM which contained some 223 pictures.

By the time of Bambers trial in October 1986, the police and the CPS had produced a COURT ALBUM which contained some 50 preselected and hand picked photographs which tended to support the prosecutions case at trial - these were made available to the jury which went on to convict Bamber, for the murders.

However, Essex police had a sectret album that was known as THE SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS ALBUM which contained 581 photographs. A large number of these additional photographs contain images which help to prove and establish that it was the police at the scene, who stage managed the bodies of Ralph, June and Sheila, and that the scene in the kitchen, and main bedroom, was interferred with by the police at the scene, not by the killer.

The CPS were aware of the existence of these other photographs, yet they proceeded with Bmbers prosecution allegeing that it had been he who had stage managed the crime scene after he had killed his sister.

In recent times, the CPS have been blocking attempts by Bamber and is legal team to get access to all the withheld photographs which were conceald in that secret album, by claiming they should not be released under pii rules, because it was not in the public interest to release them.

Bamber and his legal team and investigators have found out that Essex police cut the strips of negatives from photographs taken at the scene, in an attempt to prevent anyone reconstructing what actually took place at the scene, once the police went inside.

It is also now known, that Essex police tampered with four crucial exhibits that were originally recovered at the scene, which originally had the exhibit references of DRH/1, DRH/2, DRH/3 and DRH/4 - these were later altered to DRH/50, DRH/51, DRH/52 and DRH/53, at the behest of PI Miller. This allowed Essex police to introduce four bullet cases in the vicinity of Sheila Caffells body in the main bedroom. The introduction of two of these four bullet cases (DRH/1 and DRH/2) helped to persuade the jury at Bambers trial that Sheila had been shot twice in the main bedroom, when all along she had been shot once downstairs in the region of the kitchen, and secondly she had been shot once more in the main bedroom.

This new evidence will form part of Bambers appeal..

[miketesko]

I believe I have identified the four exhibits which were opriginally given the exhibit references of DRH/1, DRH/2, DRH/3 and DRH/4 at the scene of these murders (White house farm):-


(1) Piece of wood from rifle that was originally found on the kitcvhen floor next to Ralphs body

(2) Silencer

(3) End cap from Anshuzt rifle

(4) Second rifle found leaning against the main bedroom window, as seen by WPC Jeapes, and as later photographed by PC Bird.

---------------------------------------------------------

These four exhibits are inextricably linked to the cover up which Essex police instigated in this matter.

These are the four exhibits which originally had the exhibit references DRH/1, DRH/2, DRH/3 and DRH/4, that were later altered to DRH/50, DRHJ/51, DRH/52 and DRH/53, to allow Essex police to introduce four bullet cases into the scenario inside the bedroom, that were subsequently numbered, DRH/1, DRH/2, DRH/3 and DRH/4.

Two of these four bulllet cases that were introduced, included two bullet cases (DRH/1 and DRH/2) which the police say were found next to Sheila caffells body and helped the prosecution to persuade the jury that Sheila had been shot twice whilst inside the main bedroom, not once.

It was a necessary part of the cover up for Essex police to be able to say that Sheila was shot twice inside the main bedroom, by use of the same gun, and the fact that she could not have been shot elsewhere inside the house (downstairs in the kitchen for example). This was because Sheila was shot once downstairs in the region of the kitchen, and a second time whilst she was upstairs in the bedroom.

It was necessary to bring the rifle upstairs from the region of the kuitchen into the bedroom upstuiars, and fopr it to be planted on the body by the police, because that gun was the only one at the scene which was capable of deischarging a second shot by a process of recoil. The other rifle in the main bedoom is belived to have been a bolt action rifloe and in order for a second shot to have been discharged the bolt would have had to be activated and the trigger pulled for a second time, and this did not fity in with what the police were trying to promote. It was a necesasary part of the cover up that the opriginal shooting that took place in the kitchen was covered up altogether otherwise how the operation had been bungled would have become exposed and they would have had to answer questions for why Sheila Caffell had to have died?

In other wiords, the police could have prevented the death of Sheila Caffell if they had not bungled the earlier part of the operation once they got into the kitchen..

The police simply did not check the female body they found in the kitchen, they just assumed she was dead..

If they had done their jobs right, Sheila might have been saved, and she would not have been shot for a second time upstairs in the main bedroom..

Essex police covered up how they bungled the operation once they got into the building by declaring that they found two bodies in the kitchen, one dead male and one dead female (as confirmed by the withheld police radio and message log contents) and a further three bodies upstairs by 8:10am...

The balistic evidence was tampered with, namely, one of the two bullets which the pathologist, Peter Venezis removed from Sheila's neck at the time of her autopsy, on 7 August 1985, was described by him at that time, as a fragmaneted bullet, yet by the time this bullet fell into the hands of the ballistic exoert (Malcolm Fletcher) on 20 September 1985, it had miraculously transformed into a whole bullet. This bullet (PV/20) was tampered with to promote the idea that Sheila had been shot twice in the main bedroom by use of the same gun (since the ballistic expert went on to say that both bullets (PV/19 and PV/20) had markings upon them which were consistent with them having both been fired from the ansuzt rifle that PC Bird photographed on Sheila's body)..

The rifle at the bedroom window was covered up because if it had not been Essex police would have had to say that there were two rifles found in the main bedroom, one at the window and the other found on Sheila's body. Instead, they chose to say only one gun was found in the main bedroom, and that was the gun which PC Bird photographed on top of Sheila's body. That claim was a eliberate lie by Essex police, since the rifle which was eventually photographed on Sheila's body was actually found downstairs in the region of the kkichen and later taken upstair after its end cap was removed and planted on top of the victims body for PC Bird to photograph..

DC Hammersley and DS Davidson who were interviewed by COLP at the beginning of the 1990's told the investigating officers that the reaon why atwo red paint samples were taken from the mantlepiece in the kitchen was because a gun had been found downstuars which had red opain on the end of its barrel (without either of them identifying which gun they were referring to). According to the evidence, no gun whuich was found downstiars had rd paint on the end of its barrel? Yet, I believe that the gun they are spaking about was the rifle that PC Bird later photograohd on top of Sheila's body and the red paint was engrained into its end cap and that is why the rifles end cap was removed from the gun before PC Bird photographed the gun on the body.

Essex police ended up with the rifles nd cap in their possession but there is no information as to how it found its way there?

The anshulzt rifle was briought upstairs and planetd on the body by Essex police because they wanted to cover up for the fact how the operation inside the house had gone dramatically wrong and they had a major obastacle tomovercome in that Sheila was shot by two bullets from different guns. She was shot once whiklst she was downstuars in the kitchen by the Anshuzt rifle and secondly upstairs in the main bedroom by a second rifle or weapon.

The displacemnt of the rifle from the kitchen to the main bedroom (on to Sheila's body) and the alteration of the dour exhibits (DRH/1, DRH/2, DRH/3 and DRH/4 to DRH/50, DRH/51, DRH/52 aND DRH/53) to allow the police to introduce four bullet cases into the scenario, two of which were then directly liinked to Sheila's death (DRH/1 and DRH/2) and the tampering with one of the two bullets that the pathologist removed from the victims body at the time of his autopsy upon it, where he described one of the bullets as a fragmented one, that later transformed itself into a whole bullet, and the content of the police message and radio logs where the police reported finding two dead bodies upon entry into the kitchen (one deda male and one dead female) are all part of the cover up whuich the police instigated in connection with this investigation.

The police at the scene stage managed Sheila Caffells body, there is no two ways about it, and they stood by whilst the CPS accused jeremy of being responsible for doing that which they themselves were responsible for doing.

I have no doubt that the truth will come out in due course..

[deanasuggate67]

:( i cannot believe how obvious it is that jeremy is innocent and yet nothing has been done

[deanasuggate67]

:( as a young girl at the time i never believed jeremy was responsible, since then i have read all the books and been on websites and i have to say it really upsets me to think that jeremy has spent all that time in prison for something he clearly did not do. Someone out there knows the truth and how they can sleep at night is beyond me.

[miketesko]

deanasuggate67:-
-----------------------

What is it that makes you think Jeremy is innocent?

Why is it so obvious to you?

[deanasuggate67]

hi there Jeremy has always maintained he is innocent, the fact that the police touched evidence and important evidence was destroyed by the police and i think that julie mugford is a bitter and twisted woman who made sure that no body else would have jeremy, between her and his greedy family i think between them they have managed to ruin jeremy's life. Also the police were in contact with someone in the house while jeremy was outside with them, none of it adds up.

[miketesko]

deanasuggate67:-
----------------------
I agree with your comments entirely

Mike.

[deanasuggate67]

it really does make me angry and i wish there was something that could be done deana

[miketesko]

[quote="deanasuggate67"]it really does make me angry and i wish there was something that could be done deana[/quote]

-----------------------------------------
deana :-

The problem with this case, is that there has been too much covering up by the police, and a lack of disclosure, concerning crucial evidence. When someone is convicted for something, so serious as Jeremy has been convicted of, the authorities do not rush about, or try to prove they got the wrong man ..

I know in my own mind, and in my heart, that Jeremy did not kill his family..

It would have been impossible for him to have done so, and I agree with Giovanni's opinions on this point...

Check out the Jeremy Bamber case at :- Sleuthing for justice, for more in depth and up to date, information about the case..

Mike..

[deanasuggate67]

will do that thanks very much

[deanasuggate67]

hi again but cannot stop thinking about this and have just finished a beauty course which means i have more time to think about things how do you think jeremy deals with this? i cannot imagine what it must do to a person to be locked up for so long for something they did not do.

[deanasuggate67]

hi there again i did not realise you know jeremy as well as you do, bet you think i am one of those women who think he is sooo wonderful he could not have done it as he is so gorgeous. no it is not that reason at all surely at the time did he not have women who could have helped him? even thinking about this upsets me he must have someone who could help him? thanks deana

[miketesko]

deanasuggate67:-

I have known Jeremy since about 1989, whilst I was a serving prisoner in the maximum security jail where we were housed. I have continued to write to him since that time and I visit him occasionally. Jeremy was doing a business studies course and I was doing sociology, philosophy courses at the time..

What struck me about Jeremy's case when I first met him, was that he couldn't understand why he had been convicted for these awful murders, on the basis of so much circumstantial evidence. There was no direct evidence to make him a killer, only the fact that he phoned the police to alert them to the fact that something was happening at the farm and that he had received a call from his father in the middle of the night telling him that Sheila had got the gun and that she was going crazy and to come to the farm..

I must admit that when I first learned of the circumstances of his case, I thought the jury had got the verdict right because with Sheila's blood found inside the silencer I thought it was a rather compelling case in favor of Sheila having been murdered, and that after she was dead, someone had removed the silencer from the guns barrel, and hidden it in the gun cupboard...

Since then, of course, my views have altered considerably, for various reasons..

During the early part of his incarceration, Jeremy used to receive sacks and sacks full of mail from female admirers. I am not sure if he still does, since I have not asked him about it, but I think he must still receive lots of letters from admirers..

Best wishes

Mike.

[deanasuggate67]

hi there so what will happen now is jeremy allowed to appeal again or was this his last attempt? and how do you deal with being in prison for something you didnt do how did you both cope with this? i just cant stop thinking what a waste of life
regards deana